.
Feedback

Who Pays for a Short Sale Negotiator?

Lisa Loper of the Scott Loper Team explains the value of a 3rd party negotiator when purchasing a short sale.

A 3rd party negotiator can be invaluable to the success of a short sale.  Good 3rd party negotiators have established relationships with many banks.  They know the in’s and out’s of how to best handle each individual short sale which is unique with respect to the seller’s situation and their bank’s requirements. The process gets even more complex when there are two loans (a first mortgage and a second mortgage) with two different banks.

While the seller’s agent may be able to negotiate directly with the bank, a good 3rd party negotiator who specializes in short sales will often produce the best results for the buyer (i.e. approval at the most favorable terms and in the shortest amount of time).  Considering that a real estate agent may process a few to several short sales per year, a 3rd party negotiator may handle thousands per year.  This means the 3rd party negotiator is in regular contact with most banks, establishing cooperative lines of communication, and keeping current on industry changes in the short sale process.

There are fees involved with using a short sale negotiator.  And while banks are reluctant to pay those fees, most sellers cannot afford the fees.  So it is becoming increasingly common for the buyer to pay the fee for the 3rd party negotiator.

In any case, a seller typically cannot receive any proceeds from a short sale.  The bank agrees to take less than they are owed for two main reasons: 1) The market value of the home is less than the debt owed on the property including mortgages and selling costs, and 2) The seller has a valid financial hardship and cannot afford to pay off what is owed to the bank.

So while it may initially seem unfair for the buyer to cover the cost of the 3rd party negotiator, the bank is already accepting a loss on the sale and the seller has demonstrated they can’t financially contribute more to the sale.  Also, the buyer often makes out the best by getting a home at a price well below market value.  On a national average, short sales sell for about 80% of market value (i.e. what a non-distressed property would sell for).

Fees for a 3rd party negotiator can run between $1,500-$3,500 or 1% of the sales price of the home.  So, if a home with a market value of $300,000 is sold in a short sale for a price of $240,000 (80% of market value), it’s well worth it for a buyer to pay $2,400 to a 3rd party negotiator who can help make the sale go through at that price.

Also, many 3rd party negotiators will help the buyer recoup the cost of their fee through the use of a seller assist (buyer closing costs paid by the seller’s bank).

The 3rd party negotiator doesn’t typically get paid unless the short sale is approved and the property goes to settlement.  If the terms of the approval are different than originally offered, the buyer will have the choice to accept the terms of the sale or walk away.

Anyone who has been involved in a short sale understands that it can be a long and frustrating process.  In many cases, a good 3rd party negotiator is exactly what is needed.

The Scott Loper Team includes Scott Loper, Lisa Loper and Gina Wherry, Re/Max Realty Group, 439 Main Street, Harleysville, PA 19438, 215-256-1200.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Montgomeryville-Lansdale Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Real Jack May 18, 2013 at 08:16 pm
You state that you are not a career politician. Ok. Are you implying that the current councilRead More members are? From what I can see, the only (failed) career politician of the bunch is Jack Hanson. Would you please tell me like it is?
Bob May 18, 2013 at 09:42 pm
Old Jack Hansen did get elected twice? Am I correct? Mary Fuller is what? The 2nd coming of theRead More flying nun. give me a break. I guess just keep bad mouthing Jack Hansen will give Mary Fuller a win, a great tactic. Does confuse me, but what do I know.
C. Smith May 18, 2013 at 10:25 pm
You forgot to mention his 3 losses as well. One of which came not too long after he landed onRead More Borough Council and then decided, before the ink was even dry on the local election results, the heck with Lansdale, I want Harrisburg! Shows you EXACTLY the kind of person Jack Hansen is. A political opportunist, and nothing more. He's such an opportunist that he even created a way to funnel money to his candidates, outside of the Lansdale Democratic Party, so that if they "accidentally" endorsed someone he didn't like (aka Mary Fuller), they wouldn't have to spend any money on her! Real stand up guy that Jack. He doesn't even belong in the same sentence with Mary Fuller. Don't worry Bob -- Jack's day will come. MCDC looks pretty foolish right now, giving money to a non-partisan PAC with his stepson's name on it, in support of candidates who aren't even endorsed by the local Party.
Maria May 21, 2013 at 04:23 pm
Young man, you are doing a HUGE dis-service to your father with such comments. The fact remains,Read More your father chose to be a public figure. These kinds of things come out in an election. It's all public information. If it hurts to read these comments, then dont' read them. Dirty laundry is always aired in politics. I'm sure in you're upbringing, your parents must have told you there are going to be times in life when you will hear things that you will not like and you need to just move on from them. Looks like this is one of those time. The fact is, your dad messed up and people have the right to ask about it if he is asking them to vote for him. It is their RIGHT!!!
Maria May 21, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Yes, you can. As can everyone else here. But just remember, you're making your dad look like anRead More idiot!
Joe wolf May 21, 2013 at 05:10 pm
@ c smith they are all stupid mistakes as you said he's past that trying to clear his name up . AndRead More he HAS payed his restitution fees or he would not be in the position he is in now