.
Feedback

Richards, Shapiro Critical of Voter ID Law

Shapiro is "confident" that the new law, signed yesterday by Gov. Corbett, will be overturned; calls law "wrongheaded"

Montgomery County Commissioner Leslie Richards said Thursday that the county intends to do "whatever is necessary" to comply with the state's new Photo Voter ID law, which was signed into effect by Governor Tom Corbett on Wednesday just hours after the bill passed by a mostly-partisan 104-88 vote in the state's House of Representatives.

Richards, speaking in her capacity as chairperson of the county's Board of Elections, said she had "concerns about the constitutionality" of the new law.

"I'm particularly concerned about its impact on the elderly, [people with] low income, and people with disabilities," Richards said, adding that the Board of Elections expected "long lines" at polling places and that it would be watching for evidence of "discrimination that may come into effect because of this law."

"We'll be making sure that everyone who wants to vote in Montgomery County will be able to do so," Richards said.

Shapiro: "Confident" law will not take effect

Richards's fellow commissioner Josh Shapiro voiced much stronger criticism of the new law, calling it "wrongheaded" and saying he was "confident" it would be overturned.

"I voted against this legislation when I was in the House. I think it is designed, as evidenced by the [previous] states that have adopted it, to provide political gain to one party over the other at the expense of many in our society, particularly the most vulnerable," Shapiro said.

Shapiro praised State Senator Stewart Greenleaf (R-12) for going against most of his Republican colleagues and voting against the legislation. Greenleaf's son, Stewart Greenleaf, Jr., is the Montgomery County controller.

"I am confident that suits will be filed, legal action will be taken, and I am hopeful that as has been the case in three other states so far, the courts will overturn this law, or at the very least, block its enforcement," Shapiro said.

"You should have stayed in the [state] Legislature," joked Commissioner Bruce Castor. "I told you all last year."

Castor suggested that the April 24 primary election could serve as a bellwether for how the new law will affect waiting times at polling places, allowing for procedures to be "streamlined" prior to the general election in 2012.

Though the law has already gone into effect, photo ID will not be required during the primary election. Voters in the primary will be "reminded" that a photo ID will be needed for the November general election, the governor's office said in a statement.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Montgomeryville-Lansdale Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Raymond A Hopkins March 15, 2012 at 08:26 pm
Oh what long lines are they TALKING ABOUT! I don't think in a presidential election since 1990's have I seen a real line, even for OBAMAnia in 2008.
So let me see, they are requiring photo id at the polls? It was ok when you just had to have your voters registration card (when you vote for the first time in an area you had to provide ID for a whileI). I am not sure I see what the issue is, people don't want to be bothered by an extra minutes or so. BEcause your telling me it is going to really add signifigant time on to the total time to be checked in? Waiting is waiting. We really have large issues with government, besides this!
Watcher1 March 16, 2012 at 04:28 pm
Don't see what the big deal. As a poll worker I have not had long lines. Mostly it is the same people who vote and when you get a new register voter they happily provide their ID, whatever is reuired. So I see no real issue with having voter ID. In certain areas of Penna. there are questions as to who is voting. So for those areas voters ID are needed, but people do not want to target those particular geographical areas so the entire state requires the ID period. It is not a big deal...
Rachael Buckley March 16, 2012 at 10:36 pm
I agree. What's the big deal? You have to provide ID to buy cigarettes, buy liquor, get onto a plane, start a new job, drive a car (if you get pulled over), withdraw money from a bank, and these days, you even need ID to buy Sudafed at a pharmacy. What makes voting any different? I'm also not clear on how this is discriminatory in any way, or how it disproportionately affects the elderly, the disabled, or those with low incomes. Is it somehow harder for them to get a government-issued ID? Even those who don't/can't drive can get a free state-issued ID card.
Also, can someone tell me how this may disproportionatly affect one political party? Is it somehow more difficult to get an ID based on your political affiliation?
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
B June 19, 2013 at 08:38 pm
The petition can be found here: http://www.change.org/petitions/abused-harassed-degraded
The Truth June 19, 2013 at 09:33 pm
They can also be to American Legion Post 206 in Lansdale by the train station or any American LegionRead More to be retired...